Showing posts with label Life Insurance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Life Insurance. Show all posts

Facebooks insiders escape 200 million in taxes.


Lance Wallach



As I discuss in my Estates and Trusts book the Facebook insiders are using a GRAT to avoid estate and gift taxes. A grantor retained annuity trust is a legal way, if done properly, to avoid taxes. The strategy is a great way to shift wealth to others at almost no tax cost. GRATS are a way for the rich to avoid estate and other taxes. These trusts, which are easy to structure, transfer asset appreciation from one taxpayer to others almost tax-free. The benefits are huge. To be done successfully this strategy must use realistic appraisal feels. A valuation must be done in an unbiased way. Business Valuations can be a key to this strategy. Over the life of the trust the person who set it up gets payments plus a return. The result is usually no gift or estate tax on the appreciation of the asset. This is true even though the asset had been transferred.

Be sure that whoever sets this up knows what he is doing. A realistic business valuation is a must, or a valuation of the asset.



Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the American Institute of CPAs faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, financial and estate planning, and abusive tax shelters.  He speaks at more than ten conventions annually and writes for over fifty publications. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education's CPA's Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Mr. Wallach may be reached at 516/938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com, or at www.taxaudit419.com or www.lancewallach.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.



How much money have you lost today?


The Flooring Contractor

Official Publication of FCICA

How To Get Audited

How Much Money Have You Lost Today?
By Lance Wallach

The government needs money. Hopefully, after you read this article, they will not get any more of yours. The IRS has learned that small businesses give them the best results on audits with the least effort on their part. The IRS has decided to go where they think the cheating is taking place. Unfortunately, they think that you and your small business are not paying your fair share.

The IRS has increased audits of small businesses by fifty (50) percent, so you need to learn how to better protect yourself.  Most of what is in the next three paragraphs is what you should NOT do.

Have a lot of zeroes after the numbers on the return. Amend the return. Take a low salary while operating as an S corporation or as a sole proprietor. Have unreported income, especially in cash. Live in an expensive house, or otherwise in visible opulence, while taking a low salary. That way, people can wonder how you can afford that house, car, etc.

Let me clarify the statement in the preceding paragraph about having a lot of zeroes after numbers on a tax return. I do not mean high figures, since you must report income truthfully, of course. What I mean is that numbers that are too round lead IRS agents to think “estimate”, and this leads to unnecessary attention and scrutiny.

Make sure that your retirement plan is never updated as the law changes. Hire independent contractors, illegals, etc. Make use of an abusive tax shelter and/or listed transaction as a vehicle to reduce taxes. Seriously, you may be surprised to learn that many popular retirement and life insurance employee benefit plans fall into these categories.

If you are in a listed transaction, accountants now must report your participation to the IRS or face potential monetary fines and penalties in six figures, up to $200,000. Accountants and other tax return preparers also face increased penalties and scrutiny if clients take questionable tax positions or deductions. The upshot of all of this is that your activities, even if you are unaware that they are questionable, are increasingly likely to attract the Service’s attention, making you a likely audit target.

Even now, there are still creative ways to reduce taxes and, for good measure, insurance costs. You might try renting a captive insurance company, which often greatly reduces both taxes and insurance premiums. Use of a health savings account can accomplish the same goals. A Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association (VEBA) can do all of this as well as allowing the deduction, for tax purposes, of estate and business succession plans. Life insurance costs can be reduced through the use of a technique known as the insurance swapout process. Do you want to obtain insurance without a cash outlay? Use non-recourse loans. And, you can turn your life insurance into cash that you can use, without dying, by use of a life settlement.

These are just some techniques that, by applying just a few of them to your business, you could save thousands or even more. Above all, and more on this later, it is most important to find an accountant who acts as your tax protector instead of an IRS collection agent. Most accountants seem to simply return your tax return with instructions about how much to pay and where to send it. Only if pressed will they even be bothered to try to explain anything. You have to do better than that.

Returning for the moment to possible money and tax saving techniques, consider operating as a C corporation, which makes many otherwise non-deductible expenses deductible. Consider using a VEBA, 412(e)(3) plan or K plan to keep more of your own money in your pocket. Health savings accounts, captive insurance companies and life insurance swapouts can all reduce taxes and insurance costs.

There is probably not a business owner anywhere who does not think he pays too much in taxes. Most, in reality, actually do. Accountants have to “play it safe” nowadays, which does not reduce your tax bill. On typical returns, tax preparers’ work is often subject to “interpretations” of the tax laws. Recent law changes may force preparers hoping to lower a client’s tax bill to be less aggressive with respect to these interpretations, or else they may risk substantially increased penalties. If a client insists on taking an aggressive deduction, the preparer, hoping to protect himself from sanctions, may include a form explaining the circumstances. This may protect the preparer while triggering an audit of the client.

This understandably angers taxpayers who feel strongly about particular deductions. And these penalties do not apply to taxpayers preparing their own returns. But, of course, notwithstanding this, the more complex a return is, the more foolhardy it is to prepare it without professional assistance.

But the bottom line is that your accountant is reluctant to be aggressive anymore, and is less likely to give you the benefit of the doubt on tax deductions. For example, if a client is participating in what is known as a “listed transaction”, both the taxpayer and the accountant must file with the IRS, alerting the Service to the taxpayer’s participation. A simple failure to file, for whatever reason, can result in a penalty of up to $200,000, as can incomplete, inaccurate, and misleading filings. These penalties apply to both the client and the accountant. All of this filing, of course, may well trigger an audit. So what does the prudent business owner do? He can forget about the deduction, prepare his own return, or he can retain an accountant who is not afraid to fight with the IRS. Unfortunately, all of these options are difficult. The Internal Revenue Code is complex, and very few accountants understand most of it. And the IRS has recently made the accountant into a policeman. Most accountants are honest and knowledgeable, but are forced to be cautious. They try to do what is best for their clients, but the IRS has recently made that almost impossible. Also, every year, the tax laws are changed to one extent or another, and accountants are constantly challenged to remain current, knowledgeable, and proficient. In light of all this, you may want to test your accountant’s knowledge. Consider asking him the following questions:

1. Why have I not been using a 412(e)(3) plan or a captive insurance company to reduce my taxes and other expenses?
2. Why have not I been using a VEBA to reduce my health insurance costs?
3. Am I a good candidate for a K or double K to reduce taxes presently and provide for a secure retirement?
4. What strategies are you familiar with whereby I can legally deduct the cost of my life insurance?
5. Why have not you given me a copy of the IRS industry specialization report (which can be obtained free from the IRS) which shows the items that the IRS will be looking at in my business, both with respect to who will be audited and what will be looked at in an audit, and will provide me with a lot of other useful information?
6. Am I currently using any strategies that the IRS considers abusive?

You may be disappointed, but you should not be surprised, if you discover that your accountant knows little or nothing with respect to the answers to these questions.

If you don’t want the IRS to get every last drop, and if they come to visit you, which they may, you will be wise to utilize some of the information that you have just read. Unlike your accountant, your insurance agent-financial planner, and your other advisors, I write best-selling books for The American Institute of CPAs. If you have a great accountant, he has probably read some of them. If your accountant is an IRS tax collector, you may want to find one who will be your IRS protector. There are some of them out there, but many of them do not need you. They have too many other smart business owners that they are already helping. Do something now, both in terms of protecting your assets and reducing your taxes, before it’s too late. Things are going to get a lot worse. Maybe you can be one of the smart ones who learns how to take advantage of our current economic problems.  People have made a lot of money with investments this year; my retirement plans and the retirement plans of my clients have all made money this year. Don’t believe your stock broker, other advisors or your mother-in-law. It has been possible to make money, run your business more efficiently and profit in this current situation. You can either bury your head in the sand and pretend there’s nothing you can do, or you can take a few steps to get all your stock market losses back, substantially improve your current situation and protect your assets.
Many of you have received information about the current state of your investments in the past few months. Sticker shock would be an understatement. Thousands have been lost as a direct result of the fiascoes constantly occurring as of this writing. The downward spiral will continue, as the shrapnel from these events moves throughout our failing economy. It won't stop in the foreseeable future, and it will entail more than just monetary losses. Trust me, no stone will be left unturned, including that of increased IRS audits for the express purpose of raising money, which in fact has already started.
           
In this day, the veil has been pulled back on the stock market's heavy hitters. Consumers now know there is indeed no "wizard" behind the curtain, just a few individuals in designer suits pulling down astronomical sums of money for the advice they send down from on high.

Consumers need advisors who can guide them toward a safe harbor. Financeexperts.org can give you the help you need in this failing economy. The leading authorities are members, and will most likely give helpful feedback. Consumers are fearful, and if they say they aren't, they probably aren't being honest. But things do not have to look and seem so bleak.

But when it comes to who will receive most of our compassion, my money is on the investors. We hate to have an "I told you so" attitude, but at times it is hard to avoid. However, rather than dwell on this compassion, why not capitalize on it? Often unforeseen opportunities arise from the ashes of situations such as these. In fact, many such opportunities are available as I write this. They will be taken advantage of by those with the imagination and talent to position themselves to do so. 
By reading this, you may be off to a good start. There are many ideas you will get from our leading finance experts to better run your business, reduce taxes and insurance costs, and much more. You will learn how to avoid audits, which are already up fifty (50) percent and are expected to increase further still, and turn your accountant into your protector instead of a tax collector. You will learn from Lance Wallach, who, as an American Institute of CPAs instructor and course developer, teaches CPAs. Lance also draws upon the knowledge and expertise of his associates, who are the leading finance experts in the United States. None of them work for any of the firms that were affected by the recent and ongoing financial fiascoes. Many of them perceived the arrival of these problems, and only their clients benefited because most other business people were too busy buying products from stockbrokers, insurance agents, and so-called financial planners who did not know what was going on. In Lance's spare time, between speaking at conventions, writing and helping a select few business owners, Lance appears as an expert witness.
In fact, for two days in Sept 2008, Lance Wallach testified as an expert witness in Federal Court for a business owner that was sold a faulty financial product by a combination of his accountant and a so-called retirement plan expert. After Lance completed his testimony, the judge called the retirement plan salesman a "crook" and said that he should settle with the plaintiff. He did not, and the jury awarded the business owner TWICE what he had sued for. As a side note, Lance had advised the lawyer that this was a so-called "ERISA case" and instead of the $400,000 that the business owner was suing for, $800,000 (double damages, as is possible in "ERISA" cases), could be awarded if the jury felt that was appropriate.
The point is that, under no circumstances, should you be forced to lie down and take the abuse and malpractice that most salespeople pin on you. Get your financial and business affairs in order, and, if necessary, take some action! Take some serious action!



Lance Wallach is a frequent speaker at national conventions and writes for more than 50 publications. He was the National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year. He welcomes your contact. E-mail lawallach@aol.com or call (516) 938-5007 for more info.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any other type of advice for any specific individual or entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.   

Life Insurance

Most Americans are unaware that their life insurance policy could be one of the most valuable assets they own and that it can be sold for cash. A life settlement is an option that provides financial security to many seniors and always results in a better outcome for a policyholder than surrendering or lapsing the policy.

-Lance Wallach, Author, Speaker, tax/life insurance expert. Contact Lance and his team of experts at 516-236-8440  or  wallachinc@gmail.com


Life insurance & Annuties

Life insurance & Annuties

Will Your Municipal Bond or Your Life Insurance Company Still Have Value Next Year?

-->
Published in The Finance Toolbox

By Lance Wallach

Investor protection with municipal bonds is so spotty that there is potential for much mischief.

Disclosure, that bedrock of fair securities markets, is the heart of the problem facing municipal investors. Municipal issuers often don’t file the most basic reports outlining their operating results or material changes in their financial conditions.

Even though hospitals, cities and states that borrow money are required by their bond covenants to make such filings, nondisclosure among the nearly 60,000 issuers is common.

With the S.E.C. largely on the sidelines, disclosure enforcement in the municipal market is left to participants. Do you think they really want to police themselves very closely? That leaves individuals who trade the securities, the investors, and the dealers, to monitor the disclosure information. There is almost no penalty for not complying with those requirements. This is another disaster waiting to happen. If you own municipal bonds, you had better be careful. You may want to investigate www.financeexperts.org and select someone that knows what they are doing to assist you.

Do you have a life insurance or annuity policy? If so, you may be in trouble. The plummeting financial markets are dragging down the life insurance industry, which is an important component of the U.S. economy. Continuously escalating losses weaken the companies’ capital and eat away at investor confidence.

More than a dozen life insurers have been awaiting action on applications for aid from the government’s $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, and the industry is expecting an answer to its request for a bank-style bailout in the upcoming weeks. So far, the government hasn’t stated whether or not insurers qualify for the program.
Life insurers have undoubtedly been taking a beating in recent weeks. The Dow Jones Wilshire U.S. Life Insurance Index has fallen 82% since its May 2007 all time high. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has lost 21% this year to date.

Several of the hardest-hit companies are century-old names that insure the lives of millions of Americans. Shares of Hartford Financial Services Group Inc. are down 93% as of the close on Wednesday, March 11, 2009 from their 2008 high. MetLife Inc. and Prudential Financial Inc. are both suffering as the value of their vast investment portfolios declines.

As the economy weakens, analysts say many insurers face losses can eat away at the capital cushions regulators require them to maintain. In addition, experts say the industry is going through its most chaotic period in recent history and it’s a pretty scary situation right now.
The consequences of a weakened life-insurance industry for the overall economy are significant because life insurers are among the biggest holders of the nation’s corporate debt. For example, if life insurers stop buying bonds, the capital markets may not fully recover. Their buying activity has already declined.

Wall Street analysts say another problem for some life insurers is obligations for variable annuities, a retirement-income product that often guarantees minimum withdrawals or investment returns. As stock markets plunge to new lows, life insurers need to set aside additional funds to show regulators they can meet their obligations, further crimping sparse capital.

Life insurers’ woes have come largely from investment grade corporate bonds, commercial real estate and mortgages, regulatory filings show. Many insurers ended 2008 with high levels of losses that, due to accounting rules, they haven’t had to record on their bottom lines.
Hartford Financial had $14.6 billion in unrealized losses at year’s end. In addition, Hartford Insurance, through its agents, sold life insurance policies that were part of a welfare benefit plan popularly known as Niche Marketing, which has long been under IRS attack and is almost certainly regarded by the Service as an abusive tax shelter and/or listed transaction. Prudential, the second-largest insurer by assets, had nearly $11.3 billion in unrealized losses, up $5.4 billion in the fourth quarter from the previous quarter.

Lance Wallach, the National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year, speaks and writes extensively about retirement plans, Circular 230 problems and tax reduction strategies. He speaks at more than 40 conventions annually, writes for over 50 publications, is quoted regularly in the press, and has written numerous best-selling AICPA books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Business Hot Spots. Contact him at 516.938.5007 or visit www.vebaplan.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any other type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

419 Welfare Benefit Plans


HG EXPERTS

Legal Experts Directory


May 9, 2012     By  Sam Susser


 

A view from a former IRS Agent, CPA, College Professor


Welfare Benefit Plans (WBP), also known as Welfare Benefit Trusts and Welfare Benefit Funds are vehicles by which employers may offer their employees and retirees with certain types of insurance coverage (e.g., life insurance, health insurance, disability insurance, and long-term care), as well as other benefits such as severance payments and educational funding. If properly designed and in compliance with IRC sections 419 and 419A, WBPs offer employers with a valid tax deduction. However, as is the case with many plans that offer opportunities for deductibility, some WBPs fail to comply with Code standards, invite abuse, and otherwise are used inappropriately as a basis to reduce taxable income.
It is, therefore, not surprising that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has targeted WBP, designating many such plans as “listed transactions.” The IRS’ attack arsenal includes, but is not limited to: Notice 2007-83 (where the IRS intends to challenge claimed tax benefits meeting the definition of a “listed transaction”); Notice 2007-84 (where the IRS may challenge trust arrangements purporting to provide non-discriminatory medical and life insurance benefits, if such plans are, in substance, discriminatory); Revenue Ruling 2007-65 (where the IRS will not disallow deductions for such arrangements for prior year tax years, except to the extent that deductions have exceeded the amount of insurance included on the participant’s Form W-2 for a particular year), and IR-2007-170 (the IRS’ guidance position on WBPs). Accordingly, taxpayers who have claimed deductions pursuant to Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 419 are receiving letters from the IRS inviting them to an audit.
THE GOOD:
Let’s start off with a proposition that may surprise many of you – the IRS is generally good. No, that’s not an oxymoron. The rest of this article is in the words of Sam Susser:

For over 35 years, I have had the privilege of representing the IRS and the US taxpayers on tax audits. Our goal was to always determine the correct tax –whether the outcome was a deficiency or a refund. The bottom line, which the IRS supported, was to “do the right thing.” Over these years, I have met and befriended many competent and exemplary agents. As with all industries, there are a few who simply go through the motions, and there are a few who are simply incompetent. Fortunately, the latter two groups are in the minority. Now that I represent clients who are being audited by IRS, my objectives have not changed. The right thing must still be done. I only hope to get a well-versed agent who knows the law and can make a determination based on facts and circumstances, and not by preconceived notions.
I have been resolving the WBP issue mostly at the Revenue Agent (RA) level. Most RAs are knowledgeable in the area of WBP, and it it a pleasure dealing with them. My clients became involved with both abusive plans as well as what I determined to be non-abusive plan. Because most clients have sought the opinions of an independent professional tax attorney, CPA, Enrolled Agent , or other independent professionals who the IRS deems to be knowledgeable and capable of rendering an opinion on a Plan, Prior to 2007 I had a good case for abating the penalty and any interest thereon due to the reasonable cause exception. The RAs accepted my briefs for penalty relief and I usually resolved the case agreed at the agent’s level. The right thing was being done by both sides. Since 2007 the bar has been raised in meeting the reasonable cause exception. Simply put, if taxpayers failed to file Forms 8886 with their tax returns, the penalty could no longer be abated due to reasonable cause. If we do not come to an agreement, the case would, at taxpayer’s additional expense, proceed to the Appeals Division. This would normally be a good strategy in nebulous circumstances. With rare exceptions this is not a good strategy under these circumstances as explained later.
Just as there are good and bad IRS agents, there are good and bad WBPs. The abusive plans that have been sold should not affect those plans that adhere to the spirit of the tax laws. Thus, of the many plans sold to taxpayers, some can be considered “good.” The “bad” WBPs should not taint the “good” ones.
IR-2007-170, Oct. 17, 2007, recognizes that “[t]here are many legitimate welfare benefit funds that provide benefits, such as health insurance and life insurance, to employees and retirees. However, the arrangements the IRS is cautioning employers about is primarily benefits the owner or other key employees of businesses, sometimes in the form of distributions of cash, loans, or life insurance policies.”
THE BAD:
A persistent pattern that I see with WBPs is that the IRS appears to presumptively hold such plans as improper contrary to the statement in IR-2007-170. From what I have indirectly encountered, it appears that the IRS may interview the plan administrator, with the primary objective of securing the plan’s participants (and audit targets) rather than determining whether the limitations of a Code Section 419 deduction were satisfied. No determination is made as to whether the plan meets or fails to meet Code requirements. The plan participants then receive audit letters: one to the entity claiming the deduction, and the other to the owner(s) of such entity. These audit letters are generally accompanied by a lengthy “canned” Information Document Request (IDR) ostensibly written by IRS attorneys.
During my decades with the IRS, IDRs are usually focused documents seeking very specific documents and information to determine whether further action is required. However, my review of IDRs on the subject of WBPs shows them to be akin to document production demands in a civil litigation. The IRS basically wants everything associated with the WBP – there is no specific focus. Moreover, they have a very expansive definition of documents, and seek them whether they are in the taxpayer’s possession, or in the possession of the taxpayer’s “attorneys, accountants, affiliates, advisers, representatives, or other persons directly or indirectly employed by you, hired by you, or connected with you, or your representatives, and anyone else subject to your control.”
What was most disturbing about these IDRs that I have seen is the fact that the RAs also have, on a number of occasions, requested copies of the tax returns for the tax year(s) under audit. This indicated to me, especially since the name of the WBP is repeatedly mentioned in the IDR, that my client was selected from the list provided by the plan administrator to the IRS. This in itself is not necessarily bad since this is a useful tool for the IRS in obtaining names of participants of plans that might not meet the muster of the Code and IRS pronouncements. However, I would think that the “give me everything from everybody” approach should not be the first step in an IRS inquiry into the validity of a WBP.
Other clients received audit letters with a similar IDR requesting information including copies of the returns under examination. These clients, however, had stopped participating in the plan many years prior to the audit years. Nonetheless, since the client's name was still on the Plan’s list of participants, the client was going to be audited. The IRS takes the position that the cash surrender value of any life insurance policy in the plan is available to the client and is therefore income to that client for the year the IRS has decided to audit Accordingly, the RAs are proposing adjustments in years in which no deduction to the WBP have been taken.
THE … ?
To rub salt into the wound, the RA has enclosed an explanation as to why the deduction is disallowed, and has proposed a statutory underpayment penalty. The tax law provides for a penalty to be imposed where a taxpayer makes a substantial understatement of their tax liability. For individual taxpayers, a substantial underpayment exists when the understatement for the year exceeds the greater of ten percent of the tax required to be shown on the return, or $5,000. This is a relatively low threshold and is easily met by most taxpayers. The penalty is twenty percent of the tax underpayment.
Following the RA’s review, the taxpayer can expect to receive a 20 – 40 page “boiler-plated” or “canned” write-up, which will wind up as the Revenue Agent Report (RAR). The RARs that I’ve seen appear obviously drafted by IRS attorneys. Sometimes the RAR is shortened as a result of “cut and paste” procedures assembled by the RA. The RARs also contain alternative positions for these proposed disallowances. Taxpayers and representatives can take little comfort when all indications lead to the conclusion that the IRS has made a determination prior to assessing all the facts and circumstances of any given case standing on its own merits. My concern is that the WBP that meet IRS requirements are swept together with those that do not, and are unjustly branded as “bad.” The participants of these “good” plans must now overcome the preconceived notions of the RA. This becomes a difficult task as RAs won't deviate from the “boiler-plated” positions, forcing the taxpayer to expend funds in seeking further relief . The Appeals Division has similarly received a directive to sustain the RA RAR thus effectively eliminating the appeals right the taxpayers normally have. The only "appeals" route a taxpayer can take is to petition the Courts for a hearing. The time, expense, and outcome in defending a WBP under this scenario are enigmatic (hence the “…?”), and well, simply put, can really become downright UGLY!
CONCLUSION:
The IRS needs to examine WBPs on a plan by plan basis, and make a determination based on the facts and circumstances of each plan. Specifically, they should be charged with independently evaluating whether a particular WBP generally adheres to the Code and the IRS’s issued pronouncements. The RA and those in charge of this project should be cognizant of the statement issued by Donald L. Korb (Chief Counsel for the IRS): “The guidance targets specific abuses involving a limited group of arrangements that claim to be welfare benefit funds.” (emphasis provided). He continues to state that: “[T]oday’s action sends a strong signal that these abusive schemes must stop.” (emphasis provided). For those plans that the IRS deems to be abusive, the IRS can concentrate its resources in auditing the plan participants. The IRS hierarchy needs to eliminate the UGLY, recognize the GOOD, and pursue the BAD.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Sam Susser
Sam Susser began his IRS career on 2/1/71, and spent most the succeeding years as an international examiner with brief stints in the Review Section and the Appeals Division. He closed out his IRS tenure spending four years as International Team Manager for South Florida. Currently Sam is in private practice and can be reached at 561-742-1005


The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.


Copyright Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC


Lance Wallach, Life insurance Litigation, abusive tax shelters

Lance Wallach, Life insurance Litigation, abusive tax shelters

Wallach Articles 1: IRS Audits Focus on Captive Insurance Plans

Wallach Articles 1: IRS Audits Focus on Captive Insurance Plans

No Shelter Here, Backlash on too-good-to-be-true insurance plan


Remodeling   Hanley / Wood

September 2011                                                

By: Lance Wallach


During the past few years, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has fined many business owners hundreds of thousands of dollars for participating in several particular types of insurance plans.
The 412(i), 419, captive insurance, and section 79 plans were marketed as a way for small-business owners to set up retirement, welfare benefit plans, or other tax-deductible programs while leveraging huge tax savings, but the IRS put most of them on a list of abusive tax shelters, listed transactions, or similar transactions, etc., and has more recently focused audits on them. Many accountants are unaware of the issues surrounding these plans, and many big-name insurance companies are still encouraging participation in them.

Seems Attractive

The plans are costly up-front, but your money builds over time, and there’s a large payout if the money is removed before death. While many business owners have retirement plans, they also must care for their employees. With one of these plans, business owners are not required to give their workers anything.

Gotcha

Although small business has taken a recessionary hit and owners may not be spending big sums on insurance now, an IRS task force is auditing people who bought these as early as 2004. There is no statute of limitations.
The IRS also requires participants to file Form 8886 informing the IRS of participation in this “abusive transaction.” Failure to file or to file incorrectly will cost the business owner interest and penalties. Plus, you’ll pay back whatever you claimed for a deduction, and there are additional fines — possibly 70% of the tax benefit you claim in a year. And, if your accountant does not confidentially inform on you, he or she will get fined $100,000 by the IRS. Further, the IRS can freeze assets if you don’t pay and can fine you on a corporate and a personal level despite the type of business entity you have.

Legal Wrangling

Currently, small businesses facing audits and potentially huge tax penalties over these plans are filing lawsuits against those who marketed, designed, and sold the plans. Find out promptly if you have one of these plans and seek advice from a knowledgeable accountant to help you properly file Form 8886.

Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters, financial, international tax, and estate planning.  He writes about 412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR, and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, lawallach@aol.com or visit  www.taxaudit419.com, www.vebaplan.org, www.section79.plan


This article is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as specific legal or financial advice.


  

Lance Wallach - Life insurance, Expert Witness Testimony, Expert Witness Services

Lance Wallach - Life insurance, Expert Witness Testimony, Expert Witness Services

Life insurance Litigation

Life insurance Litigation : About

Raymond Ankner Insurance

Raymond Ankner -Expected to be the biggest life insurance failure in Illinois : Tax Crimes - Is the IRS Coming to Get You? Lance Wallach, expert witness.

Lance Wallach - The Nation's Foremost 419 and 412i plans expert

Lance Wallach - The Nation's Foremost 419 and 412i plans expert

Lance Wallach - Section 79

Lance Wallach - Section 79

Lance Wallach Expert Witness

Lance Wallach Expert Witness

Call for Tax Resolution, IRS Audit Defense, Expert Witness Lance Wallach

Call for Tax Resolution, IRS Audit Defense, Expert Witness Lance Wallach

Lance Wallach - Section 79 Problem

Lance Wallach - Section 79

Abusive Tax Shelters & 419 Plans Lawsuits

Abusive Tax Shelters & 419 Plans Lawsuits

Lance Wallach Life Insurance: Life insurance beneficiary files putative class action lawsuit

Lance Wallach Life Insurance: Life insurance beneficiary files putative class action lawsuit