Showing posts with label irs audit help. Show all posts
Showing posts with label irs audit help. Show all posts

TAX MATTERS: ABUSIVE INSURANCE PLANS GET RED FLAG by Lance Wallach


 

TAX MATTERS: ABUSIVE INSURANCE PLANS GET RED FLAG   

by Lance Wallach

 

 Finance / Taxes   

The IRS in Notice 2007-83 identified as listed transactions certain trust arrangements involving cash-value life insurance policies. Revenue Ruling 2007-65, issued simultaneously, addressed situations where the tax deduction has been disallowed, in part or in whole, for premiums paid on such cash-value life insurance policies. Also simultaneously issued was Notice 2007-84, which disallows tax deductions and imposes severe penalties for welfare benefit plans that primarily and impermissibly benefit shareholders and highly compensated employees. Taxpayers participating in these listed transactions must disclose such participation to the Service by January 15. Failure to disclose can result in severe penalties--- up to $100,000 for individuals and $200,000 for corporations. Ruling 2007-65 aims at situations where cash-value life insurance is purchased on owner/employees and other key employees, while only term insurance is offered to the rank and file. These are sold as 419(e), 419(f) (6), and 419 plans. Other arrangements described by the ruling may also be listed transactions. A business in such an arrangement cannot deduct premiums paid for cash-value life insurance. A CPA who is approached by a client about one of these arrangements must exercise the utmost degree of caution, and not only on behalf of the client. The severe penalties noted above could also be applied to the preparers of returns that fail to properly disclose listed transactions. The IRS may challenge the claimed tax benefits of these arrangements for various reasons:
· Some or all of the benefits or distributions provided to or for the benefit of owner-employees or key employees may be disqualified benefits for purposes of the 100-percent excise tax under IRC §4976.
· Whenever the property distributed from a trust has not been properly valued by the taxpayer, the IRS intends to challenge the value of the distributed property, including life insurance policies.
· Under the tax benefit rule, some or all of an employer's deductions in an earlier year may have to be included in income in a later year if an event occurs that is fundamentally inconsistent with the premise on which the deduction was based.
· An employer's deductions for contributions to an arrangement that is properly characterized as a welfare benefit fund are subject to the limitations and requirements of the rules in IRC §§419 and 419A, including the use of reasonable actuarial assumptions and the satisfaction of nondiscrimination requirements. Further, a taxpayer cannot obtain a deduction for reserves for post-retirement medical or life benefits unless the employer actually intends to use the contributions for that purpose.
· The arrangement may be subject to the rules for split-dollar arrangements, depending on the facts and circumstances.
· Contributions on behalf of an owner-employee may be characterized as dividends or as nonqualified deferred compensation subject to IRC §404(a)(5) or IRC §409A or both, depending on the facts and circumstances.



Lance Wallach speaks and writes about benefit plans, and has authored numerous books for the AICPA, Bisk Total tape, and others. He can be reached at (516) 938-5007. Lance Wallach, the National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year, speaks and writes extensively about retirement plans, Circular 230 problems and tax reduction strategies. He speaks at more than 40 conventions annually, writes for over 50 publications, is quoted regularly in the press, and has written numerous best-selling AICPA books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visithttp://www.taxaudit419.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.


419 Important Tax Court Case



Commentary


The court basically determined that the Plan did not satisfy the requirements of Section 162(a).  The court found that Goyak could not deduct his contribution of $1.4 million into the Millennium Plan because it is not an ordinary and necessary business expense under section 162(a).
 The next issue is that the court determined that Goyaks $1.4 million contribution was taxable to Goyak because it was a constructive dividend. (In essence the plan is set up so he can get his money out)


T.C. Memo. 2012-13

UNITED STATES TAX COURT
JOHN K. AND DANA G. GOYAK, Petitioners v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
JOHN K. GOYAK & ASSOCIATES, INC., Petitioner v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Docket Nos. 12990-07, 13022-07. Filed January 11, 2012.
Mark D. Allison and Kenneth M. Barish, for petitioners.
Alexander D. Devitis, Anne W. Durning, Roger P. Law, and
Vanessa M. Hoppe, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION


GOEKE, Judge: With respect to John and Dana Goyak (Mr. and
Mrs. Goyak), respondent determined deficiencies in Federal income
taxes of $966,155, $1,848,500, and $1,217,910 for tax years 2002,
- 2 -
2003, and 2004 respectively. Respondent also determined
penalties under section 66621 of $193,231, $369,700, and $243,582
for 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively, as well as an addition to
tax under section 6551(a)(1) of $42,742 for 2002.
With respect to John K. Goyak & Associates, Inc. (Goyak &
Associates), respondent separately determined deficiencies in
Federal income taxes of $199,503, $262,692, $297, $374,137,
$276,571, and $556,223 for tax years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000,
2001, and 2002, respectively. Respondent also determined
penalties under section 6662 of $55,314 and $111,245 for 2001 and
2002, respectively, as well as additions to tax under section
6551(a)(1) of $1,995, $11,820, $74, and $41,486 for 1997, 1998,
1999, and 2001, respectively.
These cases were consolidated for trial. As a result of
settlements between the parties, all issues in taxable years
other than 2002 have been resolved. The only remaining issues
relate to a $1.4 million contribution Goyak & Associates paid in
2002 to the Millennium Multiple Employer Welfare Benefit Plan
(Millennium Plan), a purported section 419A(f)(6) welfare benefit
fund. The issues remaining for decision are:

(1) Whether Goyak & Associates may deduct the $1.4 million
1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to
the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the years in
issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of
Practice and Procedure.