Are You Being Aggressive, Enough (Legally)? Lance Wallach, expert witness.

The question in the 80′s used to be, “How far can I push it before I get audited?” However, with increased IRS enforcement, it’s now important to ask, “Will I pass an IRS audit?”

The IRS today now uses sophisticated statistical analysis with modern technology that identifies tax returns likely to yield an additional tax liability assessment.
In other words, if your numbers don’t make sense, the computers can detect these out-of-whack ratios with ease. What this means practically is that you can’t play the “audit lottery” anymore. The computers are just too good.

The question now becomes, “How can we be aggressive, legally?”
And the answer is simple: PLANNING. Actually, Year-round PLANNING.
So long as you pre-plan your tax strategy, and make sure you have ample proof to back yourself up in the implementation of the plan, there is no need to be worried about an IRS audit.

You can still be aggressive; you just need to be pro-active.

Some suggestions are have you maxed out your pension contribution? Do you have an HSA? Are you taking deductions for having an office in your home? Do you use a K or double K plan for large deductions? Have you reviewed the IRS industry specialization manual for your industry to see what the IRS is looking hard at this year?

Is your accountant an IRS tax collector, or your protector? Accountants now have to notify the IRS of some deductions on YOUR return, or be fined a minimum of $100,000. A lot of audits result from this. The form that your accountant has to file is confidential.
As an expert witness Lance Wallach's side has never lost a case. People need to be careful of 419 Welfare Benefit Plans, 412i plans, Section 79 plans and Captive Insurance Plans. Most of these plans are sold by insurance agents. If you are in an abusive, listed or similar transaction plan you need to file under IRS 6707a. The participant files form 8886, and the salesmen or accountant who signs the tax returns files form 8918 if they got paid over $10,000. They are called Material Advisors and face a minimum $100,000 fine. Some plans are offshore which could involve FBAR or OVDI filings. If you have money overseas you probably need to file for IRS tax amnesty. If you want to reduce the tax we suggest that you first file and then opt out. For more information Google Lance Wallach.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

Abusive Insurance and Retirement Plans

Abusive Insurance and Retirement Plans

FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: FBAR-What are You Hiding

FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: FBAR-What are You Hiding: The collapse of Swiss bank secrecy, the IRS settlement with UBS, the criminal investigation of HSBC and the related IRS voluntary disclo...






Friday, March 7, 2014


FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: IRS FBAR Voluntary Disclosure Initiative, opt out ...

FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: IRS FBAR Voluntary Disclosure Initiative, opt out ...:  Lance Wallach The 2012 OVDI, which is still open, is patterned after the 2011 OVDI, but increases the maximum Report of Foreign Ban...

Section 79 Plan information to keep you out of the auditor's office.

Section 79 Plan information to keep you out of the auditor's office.: Section 79 Plans, Captive Insurance, Listed and Reportable Transactions are all targets of IRS Auditors. isted transactions,8886 form,tax deductions,audits,expert scams,6707A,expert witness,insurance,scam,tax deduction

CJA and associates 419 plan lawsuits IRS audits Reviews | Scambook

CJA and associates 419 plan lawsuits IRS audits Reviews | Scambook

Facebooks insiders escape 200 million in taxes.


Lance Wallach



As I discuss in my Estates and Trusts book the Facebook insiders are using a GRAT to avoid estate and gift taxes. A grantor retained annuity trust is a legal way, if done properly, to avoid taxes. The strategy is a great way to shift wealth to others at almost no tax cost. GRATS are a way for the rich to avoid estate and other taxes. These trusts, which are easy to structure, transfer asset appreciation from one taxpayer to others almost tax-free. The benefits are huge. To be done successfully this strategy must use realistic appraisal feels. A valuation must be done in an unbiased way. Business Valuations can be a key to this strategy. Over the life of the trust the person who set it up gets payments plus a return. The result is usually no gift or estate tax on the appreciation of the asset. This is true even though the asset had been transferred.

Be sure that whoever sets this up knows what he is doing. A realistic business valuation is a must, or a valuation of the asset.



Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the American Institute of CPAs faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, financial and estate planning, and abusive tax shelters.  He speaks at more than ten conventions annually and writes for over fifty publications. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education's CPA's Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Mr. Wallach may be reached at 516/938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com, or at www.taxaudit419.com or www.lancewallach.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.



Disclosures Notice 2007–85 This notice provides guidance to material advisors required to file a disclosure


Disclosures
Notice 2007–85
This notice provides guidance to material
advisors required to file a disclosure
statement.

Disclosures
Notice 2007–85
This notice provides guidance to material
advisors required to file a disclosure
statement by October 31, 2007, under
§ 301.6111–3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations.
BACKGROUND
On August 3, 2007, the Internal
Revenue Service and Treasury Department
published final regulations under
§ 301.6111–3 in the Federal Register
(72 FR 43157) providing the rules relating
to the disclosure of reportable transactions
by material advisors under section 6111
of the Internal Revenue Code. See T.D.
9351, 2007–38 I.R.B. 616. In general,
these regulations apply to transactions
with respect to which a material advisor
makes a tax statement on or after August
3, 2007. However, these regulations apply
to transactions of interest entered into on
or after November 2, 2006, with respect
to which a material advisor makes a tax
statement on or after November 2, 2006.
The regulations provide that each material
advisor, with respect to any reportable
transaction, must file a return as
described in § 301.6111–3(d). Section
301.6111–3(d) provides that each material
advisor required to file a disclosure
statement under § 301.6111–3 must file
a completed Form 8918, “Material Advisor
Disclosure Statement” (or successor
form). The Form 8918 must be filed with
the Office of Tax Shelter Analysis (OTSA)
by the last day of the calendar month that
follows the end of the calendar quarter
in which the advisor became a material
advisor with respect to the reportable
transaction or in which the circumstances
necessitating an amended disclosure occur.
Prior to the publication of the final regulations,
material advisors were required
to disclose reportable transactions on Form
8264, “Application for Registration of a
Tax Shelter.” Notice 2004–80, 2004–2
C.B. 963, and Notice 2005–22, 2005–1
C.B. 756, described the manner in which
the Form 8264 was to be completed.
INTERIM PROVISION
The next due date for disclosures by
material advisors is October 31, 2007. As
of the date of release of this notice, Form
8918 has not yet been published. The IRS
anticipates that the Form 8918 will be published
soon.
Due to the unavailability of Form 8918,
a material advisor required to file a completed
Form 8918 by October 31, 2007,
will be treated as satisfying the disclosure
requirement of § 301.6111–3(d) if the
material advisor files Form 8264 instead.
If Form 8918 is published on or before
October 31, 2007, material advisors may
choose to use either Form 8918 or Form
8264 for disclosures required to be filed by
October 31, 2007. For disclosures required
to be filed after October 31, 2007, material
advisors must use Form 8918 (or successor
form) unless instructed otherwise by the
IRS. Reportable transactions disclosed on
the Form 8264 should be disclosed in the
manner described in Notice 2004–80 and
Notice 2005–22.
EFFECTIVE DATE
This notice is effective October 16,
2007, the date this notice was released to
the public.
DRAFTING INFO

TAX MATTERS: ABUSIVE INSURANCE PLANS GET RED FLAG by Lance Wallach


 

TAX MATTERS: ABUSIVE INSURANCE PLANS GET RED FLAG   

by Lance Wallach

 

 Finance / Taxes   

The IRS in Notice 2007-83 identified as listed transactions certain trust arrangements involving cash-value life insurance policies. Revenue Ruling 2007-65, issued simultaneously, addressed situations where the tax deduction has been disallowed, in part or in whole, for premiums paid on such cash-value life insurance policies. Also simultaneously issued was Notice 2007-84, which disallows tax deductions and imposes severe penalties for welfare benefit plans that primarily and impermissibly benefit shareholders and highly compensated employees. Taxpayers participating in these listed transactions must disclose such participation to the Service by January 15. Failure to disclose can result in severe penalties--- up to $100,000 for individuals and $200,000 for corporations. Ruling 2007-65 aims at situations where cash-value life insurance is purchased on owner/employees and other key employees, while only term insurance is offered to the rank and file. These are sold as 419(e), 419(f) (6), and 419 plans. Other arrangements described by the ruling may also be listed transactions. A business in such an arrangement cannot deduct premiums paid for cash-value life insurance. A CPA who is approached by a client about one of these arrangements must exercise the utmost degree of caution, and not only on behalf of the client. The severe penalties noted above could also be applied to the preparers of returns that fail to properly disclose listed transactions. The IRS may challenge the claimed tax benefits of these arrangements for various reasons:
· Some or all of the benefits or distributions provided to or for the benefit of owner-employees or key employees may be disqualified benefits for purposes of the 100-percent excise tax under IRC §4976.
· Whenever the property distributed from a trust has not been properly valued by the taxpayer, the IRS intends to challenge the value of the distributed property, including life insurance policies.
· Under the tax benefit rule, some or all of an employer's deductions in an earlier year may have to be included in income in a later year if an event occurs that is fundamentally inconsistent with the premise on which the deduction was based.
· An employer's deductions for contributions to an arrangement that is properly characterized as a welfare benefit fund are subject to the limitations and requirements of the rules in IRC §§419 and 419A, including the use of reasonable actuarial assumptions and the satisfaction of nondiscrimination requirements. Further, a taxpayer cannot obtain a deduction for reserves for post-retirement medical or life benefits unless the employer actually intends to use the contributions for that purpose.
· The arrangement may be subject to the rules for split-dollar arrangements, depending on the facts and circumstances.
· Contributions on behalf of an owner-employee may be characterized as dividends or as nonqualified deferred compensation subject to IRC §404(a)(5) or IRC §409A or both, depending on the facts and circumstances.



Lance Wallach speaks and writes about benefit plans, and has authored numerous books for the AICPA, Bisk Total tape, and others. He can be reached at (516) 938-5007. Lance Wallach, the National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year, speaks and writes extensively about retirement plans, Circular 230 problems and tax reduction strategies. He speaks at more than 40 conventions annually, writes for over 50 publications, is quoted regularly in the press, and has written numerous best-selling AICPA books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visithttp://www.taxaudit419.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.


How much money have you lost today?


The Flooring Contractor

Official Publication of FCICA

How To Get Audited

How Much Money Have You Lost Today?
By Lance Wallach

The government needs money. Hopefully, after you read this article, they will not get any more of yours. The IRS has learned that small businesses give them the best results on audits with the least effort on their part. The IRS has decided to go where they think the cheating is taking place. Unfortunately, they think that you and your small business are not paying your fair share.

The IRS has increased audits of small businesses by fifty (50) percent, so you need to learn how to better protect yourself.  Most of what is in the next three paragraphs is what you should NOT do.

Have a lot of zeroes after the numbers on the return. Amend the return. Take a low salary while operating as an S corporation or as a sole proprietor. Have unreported income, especially in cash. Live in an expensive house, or otherwise in visible opulence, while taking a low salary. That way, people can wonder how you can afford that house, car, etc.

Let me clarify the statement in the preceding paragraph about having a lot of zeroes after numbers on a tax return. I do not mean high figures, since you must report income truthfully, of course. What I mean is that numbers that are too round lead IRS agents to think “estimate”, and this leads to unnecessary attention and scrutiny.

Make sure that your retirement plan is never updated as the law changes. Hire independent contractors, illegals, etc. Make use of an abusive tax shelter and/or listed transaction as a vehicle to reduce taxes. Seriously, you may be surprised to learn that many popular retirement and life insurance employee benefit plans fall into these categories.

If you are in a listed transaction, accountants now must report your participation to the IRS or face potential monetary fines and penalties in six figures, up to $200,000. Accountants and other tax return preparers also face increased penalties and scrutiny if clients take questionable tax positions or deductions. The upshot of all of this is that your activities, even if you are unaware that they are questionable, are increasingly likely to attract the Service’s attention, making you a likely audit target.

Even now, there are still creative ways to reduce taxes and, for good measure, insurance costs. You might try renting a captive insurance company, which often greatly reduces both taxes and insurance premiums. Use of a health savings account can accomplish the same goals. A Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association (VEBA) can do all of this as well as allowing the deduction, for tax purposes, of estate and business succession plans. Life insurance costs can be reduced through the use of a technique known as the insurance swapout process. Do you want to obtain insurance without a cash outlay? Use non-recourse loans. And, you can turn your life insurance into cash that you can use, without dying, by use of a life settlement.

These are just some techniques that, by applying just a few of them to your business, you could save thousands or even more. Above all, and more on this later, it is most important to find an accountant who acts as your tax protector instead of an IRS collection agent. Most accountants seem to simply return your tax return with instructions about how much to pay and where to send it. Only if pressed will they even be bothered to try to explain anything. You have to do better than that.

Returning for the moment to possible money and tax saving techniques, consider operating as a C corporation, which makes many otherwise non-deductible expenses deductible. Consider using a VEBA, 412(e)(3) plan or K plan to keep more of your own money in your pocket. Health savings accounts, captive insurance companies and life insurance swapouts can all reduce taxes and insurance costs.

There is probably not a business owner anywhere who does not think he pays too much in taxes. Most, in reality, actually do. Accountants have to “play it safe” nowadays, which does not reduce your tax bill. On typical returns, tax preparers’ work is often subject to “interpretations” of the tax laws. Recent law changes may force preparers hoping to lower a client’s tax bill to be less aggressive with respect to these interpretations, or else they may risk substantially increased penalties. If a client insists on taking an aggressive deduction, the preparer, hoping to protect himself from sanctions, may include a form explaining the circumstances. This may protect the preparer while triggering an audit of the client.

This understandably angers taxpayers who feel strongly about particular deductions. And these penalties do not apply to taxpayers preparing their own returns. But, of course, notwithstanding this, the more complex a return is, the more foolhardy it is to prepare it without professional assistance.

But the bottom line is that your accountant is reluctant to be aggressive anymore, and is less likely to give you the benefit of the doubt on tax deductions. For example, if a client is participating in what is known as a “listed transaction”, both the taxpayer and the accountant must file with the IRS, alerting the Service to the taxpayer’s participation. A simple failure to file, for whatever reason, can result in a penalty of up to $200,000, as can incomplete, inaccurate, and misleading filings. These penalties apply to both the client and the accountant. All of this filing, of course, may well trigger an audit. So what does the prudent business owner do? He can forget about the deduction, prepare his own return, or he can retain an accountant who is not afraid to fight with the IRS. Unfortunately, all of these options are difficult. The Internal Revenue Code is complex, and very few accountants understand most of it. And the IRS has recently made the accountant into a policeman. Most accountants are honest and knowledgeable, but are forced to be cautious. They try to do what is best for their clients, but the IRS has recently made that almost impossible. Also, every year, the tax laws are changed to one extent or another, and accountants are constantly challenged to remain current, knowledgeable, and proficient. In light of all this, you may want to test your accountant’s knowledge. Consider asking him the following questions:

1. Why have I not been using a 412(e)(3) plan or a captive insurance company to reduce my taxes and other expenses?
2. Why have not I been using a VEBA to reduce my health insurance costs?
3. Am I a good candidate for a K or double K to reduce taxes presently and provide for a secure retirement?
4. What strategies are you familiar with whereby I can legally deduct the cost of my life insurance?
5. Why have not you given me a copy of the IRS industry specialization report (which can be obtained free from the IRS) which shows the items that the IRS will be looking at in my business, both with respect to who will be audited and what will be looked at in an audit, and will provide me with a lot of other useful information?
6. Am I currently using any strategies that the IRS considers abusive?

You may be disappointed, but you should not be surprised, if you discover that your accountant knows little or nothing with respect to the answers to these questions.

If you don’t want the IRS to get every last drop, and if they come to visit you, which they may, you will be wise to utilize some of the information that you have just read. Unlike your accountant, your insurance agent-financial planner, and your other advisors, I write best-selling books for The American Institute of CPAs. If you have a great accountant, he has probably read some of them. If your accountant is an IRS tax collector, you may want to find one who will be your IRS protector. There are some of them out there, but many of them do not need you. They have too many other smart business owners that they are already helping. Do something now, both in terms of protecting your assets and reducing your taxes, before it’s too late. Things are going to get a lot worse. Maybe you can be one of the smart ones who learns how to take advantage of our current economic problems.  People have made a lot of money with investments this year; my retirement plans and the retirement plans of my clients have all made money this year. Don’t believe your stock broker, other advisors or your mother-in-law. It has been possible to make money, run your business more efficiently and profit in this current situation. You can either bury your head in the sand and pretend there’s nothing you can do, or you can take a few steps to get all your stock market losses back, substantially improve your current situation and protect your assets.
Many of you have received information about the current state of your investments in the past few months. Sticker shock would be an understatement. Thousands have been lost as a direct result of the fiascoes constantly occurring as of this writing. The downward spiral will continue, as the shrapnel from these events moves throughout our failing economy. It won't stop in the foreseeable future, and it will entail more than just monetary losses. Trust me, no stone will be left unturned, including that of increased IRS audits for the express purpose of raising money, which in fact has already started.
           
In this day, the veil has been pulled back on the stock market's heavy hitters. Consumers now know there is indeed no "wizard" behind the curtain, just a few individuals in designer suits pulling down astronomical sums of money for the advice they send down from on high.

Consumers need advisors who can guide them toward a safe harbor. Financeexperts.org can give you the help you need in this failing economy. The leading authorities are members, and will most likely give helpful feedback. Consumers are fearful, and if they say they aren't, they probably aren't being honest. But things do not have to look and seem so bleak.

But when it comes to who will receive most of our compassion, my money is on the investors. We hate to have an "I told you so" attitude, but at times it is hard to avoid. However, rather than dwell on this compassion, why not capitalize on it? Often unforeseen opportunities arise from the ashes of situations such as these. In fact, many such opportunities are available as I write this. They will be taken advantage of by those with the imagination and talent to position themselves to do so. 
By reading this, you may be off to a good start. There are many ideas you will get from our leading finance experts to better run your business, reduce taxes and insurance costs, and much more. You will learn how to avoid audits, which are already up fifty (50) percent and are expected to increase further still, and turn your accountant into your protector instead of a tax collector. You will learn from Lance Wallach, who, as an American Institute of CPAs instructor and course developer, teaches CPAs. Lance also draws upon the knowledge and expertise of his associates, who are the leading finance experts in the United States. None of them work for any of the firms that were affected by the recent and ongoing financial fiascoes. Many of them perceived the arrival of these problems, and only their clients benefited because most other business people were too busy buying products from stockbrokers, insurance agents, and so-called financial planners who did not know what was going on. In Lance's spare time, between speaking at conventions, writing and helping a select few business owners, Lance appears as an expert witness.
In fact, for two days in Sept 2008, Lance Wallach testified as an expert witness in Federal Court for a business owner that was sold a faulty financial product by a combination of his accountant and a so-called retirement plan expert. After Lance completed his testimony, the judge called the retirement plan salesman a "crook" and said that he should settle with the plaintiff. He did not, and the jury awarded the business owner TWICE what he had sued for. As a side note, Lance had advised the lawyer that this was a so-called "ERISA case" and instead of the $400,000 that the business owner was suing for, $800,000 (double damages, as is possible in "ERISA" cases), could be awarded if the jury felt that was appropriate.
The point is that, under no circumstances, should you be forced to lie down and take the abuse and malpractice that most salespeople pin on you. Get your financial and business affairs in order, and, if necessary, take some action! Take some serious action!



Lance Wallach is a frequent speaker at national conventions and writes for more than 50 publications. He was the National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year. He welcomes your contact. E-mail lawallach@aol.com or call (516) 938-5007 for more info.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any other type of advice for any specific individual or entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.   

419 Important Tax Court Case



Commentary


The court basically determined that the Plan did not satisfy the requirements of Section 162(a).  The court found that Goyak could not deduct his contribution of $1.4 million into the Millennium Plan because it is not an ordinary and necessary business expense under section 162(a).
 The next issue is that the court determined that Goyaks $1.4 million contribution was taxable to Goyak because it was a constructive dividend. (In essence the plan is set up so he can get his money out)


T.C. Memo. 2012-13

UNITED STATES TAX COURT
JOHN K. AND DANA G. GOYAK, Petitioners v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
JOHN K. GOYAK & ASSOCIATES, INC., Petitioner v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Docket Nos. 12990-07, 13022-07. Filed January 11, 2012.
Mark D. Allison and Kenneth M. Barish, for petitioners.
Alexander D. Devitis, Anne W. Durning, Roger P. Law, and
Vanessa M. Hoppe, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION


GOEKE, Judge: With respect to John and Dana Goyak (Mr. and
Mrs. Goyak), respondent determined deficiencies in Federal income
taxes of $966,155, $1,848,500, and $1,217,910 for tax years 2002,
- 2 -
2003, and 2004 respectively. Respondent also determined
penalties under section 66621 of $193,231, $369,700, and $243,582
for 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively, as well as an addition to
tax under section 6551(a)(1) of $42,742 for 2002.
With respect to John K. Goyak & Associates, Inc. (Goyak &
Associates), respondent separately determined deficiencies in
Federal income taxes of $199,503, $262,692, $297, $374,137,
$276,571, and $556,223 for tax years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000,
2001, and 2002, respectively. Respondent also determined
penalties under section 6662 of $55,314 and $111,245 for 2001 and
2002, respectively, as well as additions to tax under section
6551(a)(1) of $1,995, $11,820, $74, and $41,486 for 1997, 1998,
1999, and 2001, respectively.
These cases were consolidated for trial. As a result of
settlements between the parties, all issues in taxable years
other than 2002 have been resolved. The only remaining issues
relate to a $1.4 million contribution Goyak & Associates paid in
2002 to the Millennium Multiple Employer Welfare Benefit Plan
(Millennium Plan), a purported section 419A(f)(6) welfare benefit
fund. The issues remaining for decision are:

(1) Whether Goyak & Associates may deduct the $1.4 million
1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to
the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the years in
issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of
Practice and Procedure.